<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ? in XPERIA archive</title>
    <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991780#M199557</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That value of 1.62 W/kg was when Sony tested it. FCC got that value as 1.28 W/kg. I would choose FCC values over any other test values anyday.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:45:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Najeed</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-17T13:45:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991777#M199554</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello , sony mobile , i purchased my xperia tipo but as soon as i got to know that it has a SAR value of 1.62 w/kg . i cancelled it immediately . no phone has this much SAR value. i am from india and indian government have imposed maximum limit on phones having SAR more than 1.6 w/kg , and tipo has 1.62 w/kg . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="loading" href="http://telecomtalk.info/india-implement-stricter-norms-mobile-phone-tower-radiation-today/99220/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://telecomtalk.info/india-implement-stricter-norms-mobile-phone-tower-radiation-today/99220/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;does this mean that tipo will get banned in india soon or will sony mobile release another version of tipo with lesser SAR value , please update us if you plan on releasing same handset with less SAR value otherwise this phone will get banned &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:57:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991777#M199554</guid>
      <dc:creator>rish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-17T08:57:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991778#M199555</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000;"&gt;As you already know going by your rants on other sites&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000;"&gt;The SAR value stated is the highest possible value - Independant tests where carried out and the values are below&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN id="intelliTxt"&gt;Sony xperia tipo regulatory approval. &lt;BR /&gt;FCC approved on 15 aug 2012, FCC ID value: PY7PM-0131 &lt;BR /&gt;FCC measured SAR &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN id="intelliTxt"&gt;Head: 1.28W/kg, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN id="intelliTxt"&gt;Body: 0.55W/kg, &lt;BR /&gt;Product Specific Use: 1.27W/kg&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000;"&gt;So as you can see no where near 1.62W/kg&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000;"&gt;Other sites posting the SAR value as 1.62W/kg have simply copied and pasted and not ran any independant tests of there own &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:08:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991778#M199555</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thommo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-17T11:08:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991779#M199556</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ok i dont know whether you are the same guy asmake.believe or not , &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;first let me clear two things&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) i want to purchase sony tipo if there is no issue with SAR value stated in tipo maual as1.62 w/kg &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) secondly i am not quoting SAR as 1.62 w/kg from some other websites , i am quoting it from sony SAR manual provided by sony mobile from here&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="loading active_link" href="http://www-support-downloads.sonymobile.com/st21/sar_ST21_1.pdf" title="http://www-support-downloads.sonymobile.com/st21/sar_ST21_1.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www-support-downloads.sonymobile.com/st21/sar_ST21_1.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thirdly since you dont want to read it here is the screenshot from the pdf that says it has 1.62 w/kg , i hope you see that &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="http://i49.tinypic.com/2v1xbo9.png" class="jive-image" src="https://community.sony.si/4d1e246acb83af9be66d517b0f107149891f7e60/687474703a2f2f6934392e74696e797069632e636f6d2f32763178626f392e706e67" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now i would like to know the answer to my question in first post from a sony official , i hope there is no problem in asking it &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:28:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991779#M199556</guid>
      <dc:creator>rish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-17T11:28:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991780#M199557</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That value of 1.62 W/kg was when Sony tested it. FCC got that value as 1.28 W/kg. I would choose FCC values over any other test values anyday.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:45:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991780#M199557</guid>
      <dc:creator>Najeed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-17T13:45:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991781#M199558</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes I know where you are claiming it from and no I am not this other person&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So it's up to you - You can go by the Sony's highest possible SAR value or the FCC independant tests either way I'll still use mine and not worry about this cancer you have claimed else where &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:00:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991781#M199558</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thommo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-17T14:00:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991782#M199559</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thommo,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;good answer.!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rish,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;here i am.!could not post on that site..!Thats why logged in here to tell you that its not me &lt;IMG class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.sony.si/html/images/smilies/011.png" alt="Slightly_smiling_Face" title="Slightly_smiling_Face" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thats it.! now other people will comment here and then you decide.! &lt;IMG class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.sony.si/html/images/smilies/044.png" alt="Neutral_Face" title="Neutral_Face" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:11:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991782#M199559</guid>
      <dc:creator>make_believe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-17T14:11:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991783#M199560</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thommo can you please provide Source of the above given SAR values? I Googled it But could Not Find.Thanx in Advance.! &lt;IMG class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.sony.si/html/images/smilies/011.png" alt="Slightly_smiling_Face" title="Slightly_smiling_Face" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:24:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991783#M199560</guid>
      <dc:creator>make_believe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-17T14:24:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991784#M199561</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;well firstly i apologize for thinking you as someone else , well your answer makes a lot of sense&amp;nbsp; and also you are thinking me as someone else ,i am not that rant person i only wrote that tipo has High SAR value on gsmarena and i am only on that site apart from my first post here , so i came here to get my doubts cleared before i purchase it . i think there is nothing wrong with that . right ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;correct me if i am wrong &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now you are saying that when sony conducted the test it came out as 1.62 w/kg and when fcc conducted it , it came out as 1.27 w/kg right ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it becomes a lot confusing for a consumer to keep track all of this . so what is the value that actually matters is it 1.62 w/kg or 1.27 w/kg &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;whic one of those value does sony certify ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and sorry make.believe its just a discussion, no hard feelings &lt;IMG class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.sony.si/html/images/smilies/011.png" alt="Slightly_smiling_Face" title="Slightly_smiling_Face" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:37:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991784#M199561</guid>
      <dc:creator>rish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-17T14:37:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991785#M199562</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right down the bottom under &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TH class="leftcolumn"&gt;Regulatory Approval&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;TH&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;TH&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;TH&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR class="odd"&gt;&lt;TD class="leftcolumn"&gt;&lt;P class="s_tooltip_anchor"&gt;FCC approval&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR class="even"&gt;&lt;TD class="leftcolumn"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s_tooltip_anchor"&gt;Date approved &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;15 Aug 2012&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;17 Jul 2012&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR class="odd"&gt;&lt;TD class="leftcolumn"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;FCC ID value: PY7PM-0131&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;amp;application_id=833512&amp;amp;fcc_id=%27PY7PM-0131%27" target="_blank" title="https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;amp;application_id=833512&amp;amp;fcc_id=%27PY7PM-0131%27" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;link&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;FCC ID value: PY7PM-0130&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;amp;application_id=244283&amp;amp;fcc_id=%27PY7PM-0130%27" target="_blank" title="https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;amp;application_id=244283&amp;amp;fcc_id=%27PY7PM-0130%27" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;link&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR class="even"&gt;&lt;TD class="leftcolumn"&gt;&lt;P class="s_tooltip_anchor"&gt;FCC measured SAR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR class="odd"&gt;&lt;TD class="leftcolumn"&gt;Head&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1.28 W/kg&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1.28 W/kg&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR class="even"&gt;&lt;TD class="leftcolumn"&gt;Body&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.55 W/kg&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.55 W/kg&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR class="odd"&gt;&lt;TD class="leftcolumn"&gt;Product Specific Use&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1.27 W/kg&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1.27 W/kg&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TH class="leftcolumn"&gt;Availability&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;TH&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;TH&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;TH&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR class="even"&gt;&lt;TD class="leftcolumn"&gt;Officially announced&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;13 Jun 2012&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;13 Jun 2012&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR class="odd"&gt;&lt;TD class="leftcolumn"&gt;&lt;P class="s_tooltip_anchor"&gt;Scheduled release&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Q3 2012 (Official)&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Source&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/Sony-Xperia-tipo-dual,Sony%20Xperia%20tipo/phones/7152,7151" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/Sony-Xperia-tipo-dual,Sony%20Xperia%20tipo/phones/7152,7151&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:41:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991785#M199562</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thommo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-17T14:41:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991786#M199563</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I still here trying to proove things&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See this link &lt;A href="http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_tipo-reviews-4718.php" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_tipo-reviews-4718.php&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thats you linking back to this very topic here that I am typing to post on and if you're reading this then I have posted,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything made or sold is tested to the very maximum for all types of reason stress and point of no return been one to name a few - Take a car, Tyres, Crash testing etc etc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So a phone in this case a Tipo would have been tested to see what the maximum SAR output would be in a situation that will probablys never happen and then you get the SAR value which Sony went to press with in there manual because if for some reason it was put to the maximum by an independant company whose findings were greater than what Sony reported then Sony leave themselves open to reprisal - This way Sony are right to print these figures and the FCC are right because there figures are what normal use would be &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So can we put this to bed now you have the proof of the FCC and the reasons why by me for Sony printing these figures &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:56:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991786#M199563</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thommo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-17T14:56:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991787#M199564</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i posted that post in gsmarena before you even replied here , you can check the timings of posting . i have nothing against you here . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and i get what you are trying to say , but i still have one doubt left i hope you can answer that .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;see fcc is a us organistaion , and this phone sony xperia tipo has two models st21i and st21a . one is for international and one is for american version , both have different radios . so fcc must have conducted tests on st21a and not on st21i right ? and the manual of st21i states it has 1.62 w/kg. whereas fcc report st21a has 1.27 w/kg . so both could be right &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now i am not trying to prove anything its just a guess by me , i may be wrong&amp;nbsp; . all i want to know is what does sony certify SAR value for st21i which we have in india . thats it . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please dont take it personally .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your time and valuable information&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991787#M199564</guid>
      <dc:creator>rish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-17T15:51:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991788#M199565</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rish,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomo also gave us phonearenas SAR value..!!n i dont know phonearena operates from america or not..!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the same document some lower sar values r also given for ST21i...i was saying you to scroll down for that..!! That values are given as certified by FCC for the model st21i...!! &lt;IMG class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.sony.si/html/images/smilies/063.png" alt="Thinking_Face" title="Thinking_Face" /&gt; as i guess..!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its better if we wait for GSMARENA to publish proper SAR values..as we both trust that source..isnt it? &lt;IMG class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.sony.si/html/images/smilies/011.png" alt="Slightly_smiling_Face" title="Slightly_smiling_Face" /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and if they publish SAR values as high as 1.6 i will also be in your side saying please dont buy for its higher SAR rating..! but for that LLETS WAIT N WATCH..!! &lt;IMG class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.sony.si/html/images/smilies/013.png" alt="Winking_Face" title="Winking_Face" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 04:10:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991788#M199565</guid>
      <dc:creator>make_believe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-18T04:10:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991789#M199566</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;yeah mak.believ phonearena is a usa based website and i read that&amp;nbsp; again and see what i found i am copy pasting it here you can check in pdf it is on pg 61 here it goes , i have highlighted the important points you can check out , my guess was right it is for st21a and not st21i . both are different&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;Sony ST21a&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;UMTS HSPA Band 1 2 5 GSM GPRS/EDGE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;850/900/1800/1900&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Important Information&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;United States &amp;amp; Canada&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;THIS PHONE MODEL HAS BEEN CERTIFIED IN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;COMPLIANCE WITH THE GOVERNMENT’S REQUIREMENTS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FOR EXPOSURE TO RADIO WAVES.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Series mobile phones have been designed to comply&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with applicable safety requirements for exposure to radio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;waves. Your wireless phone is a radio transmitter and receiver.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is designed to not exceed the limits* of exposure to radio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;frequency (RF) energy set by governmental authorities. These&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;limits establish permitted levels of RF energy for the general&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;population. The guidelines are based on standards that were&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;developed by international scientific organizations through&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;periodic and thorough evaluation of scientific studies. The&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;standards include a safety margin designed to assure the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;safety of all individuals, regardless of age and health.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The radio wave exposure guidelines employ a unit of&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;measurement known as the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tests for SAR are conducted using standardized methods with&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the phone transmitting at its highest certified power level in all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;used frequency bands. While there may be differences&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;between the SAR levels of various phone models, they are all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;designed to meet the relevant guidelines for exposure to radio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;waves. For more information on SAR, please refer to the safe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and efficient use chapter in the User Guide.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The highest SAR value as reported to the authorities for this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;phone model when tested for use by the ear is 1.28 W/kg*,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and when worn on the body is 0.74 W/kg* for speech and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.37 W/kg* for data calls. For body-worn operation, the phone&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;has been tested when positioned a minimum of 15 mm from&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the body without any metal parts in the vicinity of the phone or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when properly used with an appropriate Sony accessory and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;worn on the body. For devices which include “WiFi hotspot”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;functionality, SAR measurements for the device operating in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WiFi hotspot mode were taken using a separation distance of&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is an Internet version of this publication. © Print only for private use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10mm. Use of third-party accessories may result in different&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAR levels than those reported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;**&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Before a phone model is available&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt; for sale to the public in&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;the US&lt;/SPAN&gt;, it must be tested and certified by the Federal&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Communications Commission (FCC) that it does not exceed&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;the limit established by the government-adopted requirement&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;for safe exposure&lt;/STRONG&gt;*. The tests are performed in positions and&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;locations (i.e., by the ear and worn on the body) as required by&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the FCC for each model. The FCC has granted an Equipment&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Authorization for this phone model with all reported SAR levels&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;evaluated as in compliance with the FCC RF exposure&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;guidelines. While there may be differences between the SAR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;levels of various phones, all mobile phones granted an FCC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;equipment authorization meet the government requirement for&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;safe exposure. SAR information on this phone model is on file&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;at the FCC and can be found under the Display Grant section&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;of &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.fcc.gov/oet/fccid" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.fcc.gov/oet/fccid&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; after searching on FCC&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ID PY7PM-0120. Additional information on SAR can be found&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on the Cellular Telecommunications &amp;amp; Internet Association&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;(CTIA) website at &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.phonefacts.net" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.phonefacts.net&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* In the United States and Canada, the SAR limit for mobile&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;phones used by the public is 1.6 watts/kilogram (W/kg)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;averaged over one gram of tissue. The standard incorporates a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;margin of safety to give additional protection for the public and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to account for any variations in measurements.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;**This paragraph is only applicable to authorities and&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;customers in the United States.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;so that means &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;for st21i - SAR is 1.62 w/kg&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;and for s2t1a - SAR is 1.28 w/kg ( reported by FCC for USA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;only)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:27:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991789#M199566</guid>
      <dc:creator>rish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-18T11:27:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991790#M199567</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well buddy in the very same document it also gives the following information for &lt;STRONG&gt;st21i&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sony ST21i &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;UMTS HSPA Band 1 8 GSM GPRS/EDGE 850/900/1800/1900&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Important Information&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;United States &amp;amp; Canada&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;THIS PHONE MODEL HAS BEEN CERTIFIED IN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;COMPLIANCE WITH THE GOVERNMENT’S REQUIREMENTS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FOR EXPOSURE TO RADIO WAVES.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ST21i Series mobile phones have been designed to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;comply with applicable safety requirements for exposure to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;radio waves. Your wireless phone is a radio transmitter and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;receiver. It is designed to not exceed the limits* of exposure to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;radio frequency (RF) energy set by governmental authorities.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These limits establish permitted levels of RF energy for the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;general population. The guidelines are based on standards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;that were developed by international scientific organizations&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;through periodic and thorough evaluation of scientific studies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The standards include a safety margin designed to assure the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;safety of all individuals, regardless of age and health.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The radio wave exposure guidelines employ a unit of&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;measurement known as the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tests for SAR are conducted using standardized methods with&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the phone transmitting at its highest certified power level in all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;used frequency bands. While there may be differences&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;between the SAR levels of various phone models, they are all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;designed to meet the relevant guidelines for exposure to radio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;waves. For more information on SAR, please refer to the safe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and efficient use chapter in the User Guide.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The highest SAR value as reported to the authorities for this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;phone model when tested for use by the ear is 1.28 W/kg*,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and when worn on the body is 0.55 W/kg* for speech and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.27 W/kg* for data calls. For body-worn operation, the phone&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;has been tested when positioned a minimum of 15 mm from&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the body without any metal parts in the vicinity of the phone or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when properly used with an appropriate Sony accessory and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;worn on the body. For devices which include “WiFi hotspot”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;functionality, SAR measurements for the device operating in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WiFi hotspot mode were taken using a separation distance of&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10mm. Use of third-party accessories may result in different&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAR levels than those reported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;**Before a phone model is available for sale to the public in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the US, it must be tested and certified by the Federal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Communications Commission (FCC) that it does not exceed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the limit established by the government-adopted requirement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for safe exposure*. The tests are performed in positions and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;locations (i.e., by the ear and worn on the body) as required by&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the FCC for each model. The FCC has granted an Equipment&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Authorization for this phone model with all reported SAR levels&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;evaluated as in compliance with the FCC RF exposure&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;guidelines. While there may be differences between the SAR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;levels of various phones, all mobile phones granted an FCC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;equipment authorization meet the government requirement for&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;safe exposure. SAR information on this phone model is on file&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;at the FCC and can be found under the Display Grant section&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;of &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.fcc.gov/oet/fccidafter" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.fcc.gov/oet/fccidafter&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; searching on FCC&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ID PY7PM-0130. Additional information on SAR can be found&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on the Cellular Telecommunications &amp;amp; Internet Association&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;(CTIA) website at &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.phonefacts.net" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.phonefacts.net&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* In the United States and Canada, the SAR limit for mobile&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;phones used by the public is 1.6 watts/kilogram (W/kg)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;averaged over one gram of tissue. The standard incorporates a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;margin of safety to give additional protection for the public and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to account for any variations in measurements.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;**This paragraph is only applicable to authorities and&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;customers in the United States&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;And about above statement..FCC is an american council(as far as i know) so it will take responsibility of america only and not the whole world..!&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I end this topic &lt;STRONG&gt;for myself&lt;/STRONG&gt; here only..!! &lt;IMG class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.sony.si/html/images/smilies/011.png" alt="Slightly_smiling_Face" title="Slightly_smiling_Face" /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:06:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991790#M199567</guid>
      <dc:creator>make_believe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-18T15:06:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991791#M199568</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why are you people fighting over a Confusion between Standards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="justify"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;North American Standard.&lt;/STRONG&gt; The SAR limit for mobile phones used by the public is 1.6 watts/kilogram (W/kg) averaged over &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="style4"&gt;one gram&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt; of body tissue.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="justify"&gt; &lt;SPAN style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;European Standard&lt;/STRONG&gt;. The SAR limit for mobile phones used by the public is 2.0 watts/kilogram (W/kg) averaged over &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="style4"&gt;ten grams&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt; of body tissue.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="justify"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="justify"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="justify"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;India follows American Standard, but the Sony manual that u have quoted previously is written by following Europian standard.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:19:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991791#M199568</guid>
      <dc:creator>bibhabasu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-20T21:19:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991792#M199569</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;wow guys i found out a shocking revelation here and i understand SAR more now , since i was the one who took it to sony mobile. let me explain in simple words . there are 2 standards for measuring SAR i is EU and one is US. the US checking is done by FCC and Eu is done by europen associations. ok the limits are &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for US - it is 1.6 w/kg averaged over 1gm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and for EU - it is 2.0 w/kg averaged over 10gm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;look at the difference between averaging 1gm vs 10gm. this is the main thing rather than the value . why ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;USA is very strict as you all know. it has the most strict norms then other countries so check diff between us and eu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;lets take an example - phone 1 has eu rating of 1w/kg avg 10gm and other phone has us rating of 1.4 w/kg avg 1gm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;which has higher sar ? it is phone 1 that has higher sar . if you convert avg of 10gm into 1gm . it becomes twice or thrice the amount meaning . phone 1 has approx 2 w/kg avg over 1 gm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;meaning if tipo has 1.62 w/kg avg over 10 gm it means approx 3.22 w/kg of SAR avg 1 gm of tissue . and limit in us is 1.6 w/kg avg 1gm . that is why most cell phones dont have eu rating of more than 0.8 . so eu .8 becomes 1.6 of usa . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To put it another way, an SAR of 2 W/Kg averaged over 10g is approximately equivalent to an SAR of 4-6 W/Kg average over 1g.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;read from the source here - &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.emfacts.com/2012/08/important-differences-between-the-icnirp-and-ieee-standards-and-the-fcc-standard-for-cell-phones/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.emfacts.com/2012/08/important-differences-between-the-icnirp-and-ieee-standards-and-the-fcc-standard-for-cell-phones/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and this is the reason why india is moving away from eu to usa norms.earlier phones were based on eu 2.0 w/kg avg 10 gm. now it is moving to more strict 1.6 w/kg avg 1gm from 1st sept. all devices after 1st sept will be based on 1.6 w/kg avg 1gm. phones already released with 2.0 w/kg avg 10 gm will continue to exist till 2013&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="loading" href="http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/2012/9/1/143-Govt-orders-to-implement-new-radiation-norms-from-today.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/2012/9/1/143-Govt-orders-to-implement-new-radiation-norms-from-today.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i am not trolling here just sharing what i have come to know, so dont take it in a bad way. and also i would like to share that there are controversial studies of sar some say it is dangerous some say it is not. also in reality phones operate at a very low level than SAR rating. also using handsfree and loudspeaker reduces 80 % of risk from SAR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:20:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991792#M199569</guid>
      <dc:creator>rish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-20T21:20:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991793#M199570</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Average over 1 gm - 1.5 W/kg, does not make average over 10 gm as 15 W/kg!"&lt;BR /&gt;Average is still an average. Expressed in W/kg.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 02:05:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991793#M199570</guid>
      <dc:creator>drbalajipsy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-21T02:05:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991794#M199571</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear Rish,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Exactly..! you are right.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Therefore Now, I want your opinion and suggestion to buy Experia Tipo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should i buy Experia Tipo.? Brother i know, You bought this one so i want your opinion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Neal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;India&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:58:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991794#M199571</guid>
      <dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-07T07:58:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991795#M199572</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Sony Xperia Tipo has proved itself as the youth phone. Lots of features, cool design and less price what else is required. I am looking forward to buy it. The lowest price deal I came across is.... @ Rs. 8,899&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.shopbychoice.com/sony-ericsson-st21i-xperia-tipo-white/p/TWpZNE1EZz0" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.shopbychoice.com/sony-ericsson-st21i-xperia-tipo-white/p/TWpZNE1EZz0&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:19:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991795#M199572</guid>
      <dc:creator>sahilsolanki</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-30T09:19:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SONY Xperia Tipo SAR VALUE . why is it so dangerous ?</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991796#M199573</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hii Rish,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I chkd out discussion , and what i found is , value given 1.62 W/kg is on 10g tissue, the safty limit given by TEC India is 1.62 W/kg for 1g tissue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Moreover , if it is toooooo serious , i will test it by my self and reply u xact value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Antriksh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:03:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.si/t5/xperia-archive/sony-xperia-tipo-sar-value-why-is-it-so-dangerous/m-p/2991796#M199573</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antriksh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-20T16:03:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

